FreeTDS Development Group

["mirage 2101" <mirage2101 AT hotmail.com>]

no problem,
i've talked to a few ppl and we went through the options with all the pro's 
and con's.
we decided to take a bit extra time and implement this with seperate rows 
cause otherwise we might walk into size problems with our socketlib in other 
applications.

(by the way the java part of freeTDS is a bit quiet it seems, howcome?
i mean using the sun jdbc driver will make anything you build way too 
expensive and freeTDS works fine as far as i've seen)

Marc

> Ah.  I'm probably no use to you.  You're using one of the FreeTDS Java
> libraries, about which I know nothing.  You said you were looking "in >the
> freeTDS code", and I thought that might mean you were using the C 
> >libraries
> from Java, perhaps struggling with libtds.

> > (if i read your reply correctly, are you implying i'd be able
> > to gather all the rows
> > in a byte array if thats more convenient than the normal resultset?)

> No, well, maybe.  I wasn't implying anything, nothing profound.  I >meant
> there's no TDS reason -- nothing in the protocol -- to prevent you from
> reading rows and putting them anywhere you like, including into your
> application's notion of a collection object.  Sorry to mislead you.





_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com