freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Marc Schouten <m.schouten AT itsec.nl>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: still java problem
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:37:40 +0200
Java 2.0
i'm using a socketlibrary with commando's wich were developed internally here.
it's pretty easy to send Strings ints and bytearrays, but nothing else..
so unless i want to deal with a loose bunch of rows al sent seperately i'll
have to
find a way to sent the resultset as a whole.
and i'm not too keen on sending all rows seperately considering the
management coming
with it.
situation is as follows, clients connect to a dbcom server.
the dbcom server executes sql commands and other database commands, and then
returns
the resultset to the respective client.
and it's the last part i'm getting a bit stuck at...
(if i read your reply correctly, are you implying i'd be able to gather all
the rows
in a byte array if thats more convenient than the normal resultset?)
Marc
"Lowden, James K" wrote:
> > From: Marc Schouten [mailto:m.schouten AT itsec.nl]
> > Sent: June 25, 2002 9:40 AM
> >
> > i'm looking in the freeTDS code now, for the point where the
> > data coming in from the
> > database isn't put into a resultset yet, but still as bytestream.
> > that way i could create my own function to return the
> > bytestream to my own program so
> > i can send it to my client app, and put it into a resultset there.
> > or is there any reason i should'nt do anything like this?
>
> Marc,
>
> That's what db-lib and ct-lib do, actually: fetch a row at a time,
> optionally binding the fields to the program's variables. Your function
> will just gobble up a bunch of rows, and bundle them into an object for your
> application's convenience.
>
> Which API are you dealing with?
>
> --jkl
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: [ms AT itsec.nl]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-
still java problem,
Marc Schouten, 06/25/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: still java problem, Lowden, James K, 06/25/2002
- RE: still java problem, Marc Schouten, 06/25/2002
- RE: still java problem, Lowden, James K, 06/25/2002
- RE: still java problem, mirage 2101, 06/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.