freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Brian Bruns <camber AT ais.org>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: datetime problems
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:07:31 -0500 (EST)
Cool,
then if WORDS_BIGENDIAN is true you can set tds->broken_dates to false if
build is >= 961 and all should be well.
Brian
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Mark J. Lilback wrote:
> >This is a question I have struggled with. As long as all the 7.0 series
> >had the bug we could work around it by the server version response in the
> >acknowledgement stream. But MS doesn't delineate between 7.0 GA or SP1-3
>
> I'm manually doing a search in my application based on a call to
> "master.dbo.xp_msver ProductVersion". I imagine this only works for
> SQL Server, but it returns in the fourth column a version number
> "7.00.623" for 7.0 GA and "7.00.961" for SP3. (The other values were
> listed in the readme for SP3.)
>
> This number is also in the results of "select @@version", but not as
> easily parsable.
>
> I'm sending the query and only if the query returns a string
> "7.00.xxx" where xxx is < 961 am I noting that 8 byte datetime values
> need to be swapped.
>
> It detects fine on .623, and my PC is installing SP3 right now so I
> can test against .961.
>
>
-
datetime problems,
Mark J. Lilback, 03/27/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: datetime problems, Brian Bruns, 03/27/2001
- Re: datetime problems, Mark J. Lilback, 03/27/2001
- Re: datetime problems, Brian Bruns, 03/27/2001
- Re: datetime problems, Mark J. Lilback, 03/28/2001
- Re: datetime problems, Brian Bruns, 03/29/2001
- Re: datetime problems, Mark J. Lilback, 03/29/2001
- Re: datetime problems, Brian Bruns, 03/29/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.