freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "D. J. Hagberg" <dhagberg AT millibits.com>
- To: freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Odd problem round 2.
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 04:38:34 +0000
Tim Uckun wrote:
> OK I tried it with each field by itself and it segfaults on the "done]
> [bit] NULL" field.
> All other fields pull in fine. I tried with a couple of other tables and
> the same story.
> If the select statement returns a bit field AND any of the bit fields
> contains a 1 or 0 then it segfaults.
> It returns a 104 error message for each row in the query which contains a
> bit field that is not null.
Ahh... This might point to some unsupported datatype problem.
Historically, Sybase's bit fields would not allow null -- they always
had to be "not null". Perhaps MS extended the protocol to allow a null
bit field by defining a new datatype? Not sure where one would fix this
in FreeTDS, though.
-=- D. J.
-
Odd problem round 2.,
Tim Uckun, 01/02/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Odd problem round 2., James Cameron, 01/02/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Tim Uckun, 01/02/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Michael Peppler, 01/02/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., James Cameron, 01/02/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., D. J. Hagberg, 01/02/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Tim Uckun, 01/03/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., James K. Lowden, 01/03/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Tim Uckun, 01/03/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Lowden, James K, 01/04/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Brian Bruns, 01/21/2001
- Re: Odd problem round 2., Brian Bruns, 01/21/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.