Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: [Corpus-Paul] ...And From Blood

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ian Scott" <iscott AT tyndale.ca>
  • To: "corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] ...And From Blood
  • Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:18:35 -0500

Hi Russell,

You propose an interesting line of thought. My initial line of thought,
though, is that you are not making enough allowance for the fact that
the ingestion of blood in the Pauline Eucharist is *metaphorical*.
Modern Christians still talk about eating Christ's body, even though
they would be horrified by actual cannibalism. John's Gospel actually
plays on this tension near the end of chapter 6. Notice, too, that Luke
seems to accept the blood metaphor in Eucharist (Lk 22:20), even though
he's the one who reports (and presumably accepts) the apostolic decree.
So I think the problem with your argument is that you don't make room
for the reality that people often perform metaphorically actions which
they would disapprove of if performed literally. In fact, the
"transgressiveness" of the metaphor is often part of its power. But
thanks for pushing a stimulating question.

Best,

Ian Scott

Ian W. Scott, Ph.D. (McMaster)
Assistant Professor of New Testament
Tyndale Seminary
Toronto, Canada
email: iscott AT tyndale.ca
url: http://www.ian-w-scott.com
===================================
The Online Critical Pseudepigrapha
http://www.purl.org/net/ocp

>>> RUSSELL BOOTH <russbooth281 AT msn.com> 2/20/2007 5:25 PM >>>
I started this thread. Please allow me to restate the argument.

>The ingestion of blood is prohibited by the covenant made with Noah,
by the
>covenant made with Moses and by the Jerusalem decree (Acts 15:20 &
Acts
>21:25).

There are three prohibitions in the Jerusalem decree. Two of the four
terms
of the Jerusalem decree prohibit ingesting blood.

The Eucharist, as taught by Paul, includes ingesting blood.

Therefore, Paul's teaching of the Eucharist was prohibited by the
Jerusalem
decree.<

It's simple logic. If it's not a valid argument, there would have to be
some
reason it's not. Is there?

If it is valid, this would of course mean that the direct successors to
the
Jesus tradition did not practice Paul's Eucharist and that the blood
imagery
did not originate with Jesus.

In Galatians 1 Paul argues that others are preaching a gospel contrary
to
his and that his gospel did not originate with the followers of Jesus
or any
other person, but was revealed to him by supernatural means. And,
though he
had formerly persecuted the church he met with its leaders, Peter and
James.

On a subsequent visit, Peter, James, John and the elders at Jerusalem
forbade this element of Paul's teaching because they did not approve of

ingesting blood, according to the author of Luke/Acts.

That would explain the incident at Antioch. It seems safe to assume the

leaders at Jerusalem knew what Paul was teaching at the time that they

disapproved of it. Paul had been accused, on that same visit, of not
following the customs of Moses and of teaching others to do the same,
according to Acts. Since in his own writings we find Paul teaching the

ingestion of Christ's blood, Paul was in fact guilty of doing so.

It would seem, consequently, that Paul changed tactics from violent
persecutor to competing propagandist in his opposition to the direct
successors of the Jesus tradition, assuming the argument presented
above is
valid.

I would like some scholarly feedback - using conventional critical
methods,
if you would be so kind - regarding why it is not obvious, given the
evidence, that the body and blood imagery associated with the Eucharist

originated with Paul and not with Jesus.

James Tabor presented this same argument regarding the probability that
Paul
was the originator of the blood symbolism in his book The Jesus Dynasty
last
spring. Have scholars been exploring the possibility that the body and
blood
imagery of the meal originated with Paul since the publication of that
book?

Is anybody interested in discussing it here?

Respectfully,

Russell Booth
Minneapolis, Minnesota
russbooth281 AT msn.com

_______________________________________________
Corpus-Paul mailing list
Corpus-Paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/corpus-paul




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page