corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Edgar Krentz <ekrentz AT sbcglobal.net>
- To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] 3 Corinthians
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:16:07 -0600
A question in an area where I am ignorant: What are the reasons for
believing that 3 Corinthians is apocryphal - apart from the obvious? In
other words, suppose that Paul had written another letter that became lost
for a long time, and re-surfaced too late to be included in the Canon.
Could 3 Corinthians be such a letter? What characteristics say no?
Dave Inglis
davidinglis2 AT comcast.net
3538 O'Connor Drive
Lafayette, CA, USA
Have your read it? You can find it in English on the web.
It is a rather dull pastiche of bits and pieces from other Pauline letters. There is really nothing in it
that sounds like the Paul we know from the NT.
Peace, Ed Krentz
--
Edgar and Marion Krentz
5433 S. Ridgewood Ct.
Chicago, IL 60615
Tel.: 773-947-8105
e-mail: ekrentz AT sblglobal.net
Office: ekrentz AT lstc.edu
-
Re: [Corpus-Paul] 3 Corinthians,
Edgar Krentz, 03/02/2004
- RE: [Corpus-Paul] 3 Corinthians, David @ Comcast, 03/04/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.