corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Bob MacDonald <bobmacdonald AT shaw.ca>
- To: 'Corpus-paul' <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Flesh and Spirit
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 00:01:39 -0700
Dr Elliott
You asked what I meant by "the creative force of our language". My thought
was just that the reduction of flesh to your suggested terms seemed too
narrow for the range of usage of Paul's words. I also think, as I said, that
Paul was searching for a metaphor to express his gospel- Perhaps it is not a
creative aspect of language - but I think of it that way - as more than
descriptive - since language creates us as we absorb its meanings. Perhaps
the creative force has already happened when the metaphor is coined to
describe it. A bit of a catch-22 I expect.
I also do not think the body-soul commonplace is an adequate parallel to
flesh-spirit. The soul is thought of as disembodied - exactly the opposite
of the incarnate spirit. I am speaking of the common tradition, which I
believe is inherited from Greek thought - but I may be guilty of
oversimplifying.
Again, many thanks
Bob
mailto::BobMacDonald AT shaw.ca
+ + + Victoria, B.C., Canada + + +
Catch the foxes for us,
the little foxes that make havoc of the vineyards,
for our vineyards are in flower. (Song 2.15)
http://bobmacdonald.gx.ca
-
RE: Flesh and Spirit,
Bob MacDonald, 05/01/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Flesh and Spirit, Elli Elliott, 05/01/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.