corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X
- From: "moon-ryul jung" <moon AT saint.soongsil.ac.kr>
- To: corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:39:05 -0500
Mark,
everything is clear now.
> Both clauses of 6:14 support the point of 6:13 and the preceding argument
> that these gentiles are not to let sin reign over their bodies, but
> righteousness, since they now belong to God rather than sin.
Most commentators seem to think that 6:14b supports 6:14a, rather than
both clauses support 6:13 directly. Isn't that what BDAG says concerning
Rom 6:14?
> Even though
> they are not under Law, defined as righteous ones of Law, they are defined
> as righteous ones under grace. Of course so too are righteous ones under
> Law, for Law is a gift demonstrating God's lovingkindness so that those of
> Law belong to righteousness, not sin.
> Is not the point that whether under
> Law or not, as those under grace the gentiles whom Paul addresses are
> likewise obliged to live to God rather than sin, just like those under Law
> are?
>
This makes a perfect sense.
Moon
Moon-Ryul Jung
Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea
-
Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X,
Mark D. Nanos, 02/18/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X, moon-ryul jung, 02/19/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.