Corpus-Paul

["moon-ryul jung" <moon AT saint.soongsil.ac.kr>]

Mark,
it is not yet clear. In your translation in the following, 
> 
> > DFollowing "Let not.... Do not... but" of vv. 12-13:
> >> "For [GAR] sin will not become master of you [KURIEUSEI: fut. ind.];
> >> confirming [GAR]* you [gentiles] are not under law but under grace.

you make 6:14a confirm 6:14b. That is, the first sentence confirms
the second GAR sentence in your translation. The fact that sin will not 
become master of you confirms that you are not under the law but under
grace. Perhaps I do not understand what you mean here
by "S1; confirming S2".

Moon
Moon-Ryul Jung
Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea
 

> > 
> > (1) It makes 6:14a support 6:14b. My grammar tells that
> > GAR of 6:14b should be taken to support 6:14a. Please tell me how you
> > get the above translation?
ear Mark,
> > 
> > I do not have BAGD. Does it really say that
> > given S1. GAR S2, the first statement S1 can be taken
> > to mean to support the second sentence S2?
> > I thought the second one with GAR supports or explain the
> > first statement.
> 
> Moon,
> No, sorry if my response was confusing.
> 
> BDAG 1.c. on GAR comments that when GAR is repeated, "it occurs twice to
> introduce several arguments for the same assertion... or to have one clause
> confirm the other (under which BDAG includes Rom. 6:14)... or to have
> various assertions of one and the same sentence confirmed one after the
> other...."
> 
> Regards,
> Mark
> - 
> Mark D. Nanos, Ph.D.
> 313 NE Landings Dr.
> Lee's Summit, MO 64064
> USA
> nanosmd AT home.com