corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X
- From: "Mark D. Nanos" <nanosmd AT home.com>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 20:31:28 -0600
on 2/17/01 7:33 PM, moon-ryul jung at moon AT saint.soongsil.ac.kr wrote:
> [Moon]
> Mark, I like your interpretation because it maintains
> that hUPO NOMON = Law-People, which is the simplest reading
> of hUPO NOMON. The link betwen 6:14 and 3:21 is what I have never
> thought of. But I have some problem with your translation:
>
> Following "Let not.... Do not... but" of vv. 12-13:
>> "For [GAR] sin will not become master of you [KURIEUSEI: fut. ind.];
>> confirming [GAR]* you [gentiles] are not under law but under grace.
>
> (1) It makes 6:14a support 6:14b. My grammar tells that
> GAR of 6:14b should be taken to support 6:14a. Please tell me how you
> get the above translation?
>
> (2) What you want to say would be conveyed when you translate
> 6:14b as:
>
> Confirming that, though you are not under Law, you are under Grace.
>
> Is it what you have in mind?
Yes Moon,
That works well; I like it.
I remember experimenting with "for [although] you are not under law, you are
under grace." That was where I was before I sent you the translation you
cite, which developed a point from the BAGD (about confirmation).
I see that you also initiated some interesting discussions on B-Greek during
that time.
Take care,
Mark
--
Mark D. Nanos, Ph.D.
313 NE Landings Dr.
Lee's Summit, MO 64064
USA
nanosmd AT home.com
-
Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X,
Mark D. Nanos, 02/17/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X, moon-ryul jung, 02/18/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.