Corpus-Paul

[Loren Rosson <rossoiii AT yahoo.com>]

[Moon]
> 
> Let S1 be the set of situations in which "you are
> not under the Law"
> hold. Let S2 be the set of situations in which "sin
> will not be the master
> of you" holds. We have "you are not under the Law"
> => "sin will not 
> be the master of you". It means S1 is a subset of S2
> (the diagram of S1
> is contained in the diagram of S2). Let C(S1) be the
> complement of S1,
> and C(S2) be the complement of S2. C(S1) is the set
> of situations 
> in which "you are under the Law" holds. C(S2) is the
> set of situations
> in which "sin will be the master of you" holds. In
> order to have
> "you are under the Law" => "sin will be the master
> of you", 
> C(S1) should be a subset of C(S2). But when S1 is a
> subset of S2,
> C(S1) is NOT a subset of C(S2). Therefore "you are
> under the Law"
> => "sin will be the master of you" does not hold. 
   

Ahhh, I see now. But was Paul this logical?


Loren Rosson III,
Nashua NH
rossoiii AT yahoo.com 

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/