corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Mike Thompson" <mbt2 AT cam.ac.uk>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Ur-text of Paul's letters
- Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:12:18 +0000
--On Mon, 17 May, 1999 9:44 pm -0300 "Frank W. Hughes"
<fwhughes AT sunbeach.net> wrote:
> I don't recall any MS. of the Pauline letters (and nothing very
substantial for any of the NT) that should be dated before 200 C.E. See the
Nestle-Aland 27th edition, pp. 684-688. To go back into even the middle of
the second century you have to deal with patristic quotations which are
generally a can of worms to deal with. My experience has shown me anything
but a firm NT text in second century Christian authors. Can any NT textual
critics help us out here?
I was referring to texts from the gospels, not Paul, and I'm not disputing
the widespread variations in the text. The issue is the degree and nature of
variation.
Cheers,
Mike Thompson
============================================================================
Michael B Thompson Telephone (0)1223-741066 (study)
Ridley Hall (0)1223-741077 (home)
Cambridge, UK CB3 9HG (0)1223-741081 (fax)
http://www.ridley.cam.ac.uk
-
Ur-text of Paul's letters,
Michael Thompson, 05/17/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Ur-text of Paul's letters, Frank W. Hughes, 05/17/1999
- Re: Ur-text of Paul's letters, Mike Thompson, 05/18/1999
- Re: Ur-text of Paul's letters, Stephen C. Carlson, 05/18/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.