corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Stephen Nelson" <stephen_nelson AT hotmail.com>
- To: corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Pauline Pastorals
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 22:04:00 GMT
Greetings all!
In his last few postings, Jim West has boldly asserted (perhaps on one
occasion with toungue-in-cheek) that the Pastoral Epistles are
non-Pauline, secondary, pseudenonemous or whatever predicate comes to
hand.
It seems to me that the balance of evidence need not necessarily lead
to this conclusion.
Perhaps Jim would be so kind as to provide some compelling reasons for
doubting their Pauline authorship?
Were he to do so, I would gladly respond.
Yours,
Steve Nelson
Wycliffe Hall,
Oxford
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
Pauline Pastorals,
Stephen Nelson, 04/21/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Jim West, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Christopher Hutson, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Frank W. Hughes, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Christopher Hutson, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Jack Kilmon, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Jim West, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Errol Smith & Colleen Loo, 04/21/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Richard Fellows, 04/22/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Stephen Nelson, 04/22/1999
- Re: Pauline Pastorals, Jim West, 04/22/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.