corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Ronald Troxel <rltroxel AT facstaff.wisc.edu>
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Paul on Resurrection
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 08:50:49 -0500
Sheila,
This is a good observation, worth more than 2 cents!
Ron Troxel
>I think it is helpful to remember that Paul is
>strongly influenced by Stoicism (as seen in his ethics, e.g.) and that the
>Stoic view
>is that there exists "spiritual matter." In fact, for the Stoics, God was
>a highly
>refined, spiritual _substance_. Paul's discussion of the resurrection (in
>esp. 1 Cor
>15) affirms both the "spiritual" and the "bodily" reality of resurrection.
>The
>debates in prior posts about spirit v. body, as also the debate over
>subjective v.
>objective, are too stark. It seems to me that Paul wants to say both/and
>rather than
>either/or. So, in my view, Paul believes Jesus was raised "in the body"
>but this is
>the SWMA PNEUMATIKON, as opposed to the SWMA YUCIKON which indeed died on
>the cross.
>We, on the other hand, are heirs to Plato who divorces spirit from matter,
>so our
>notion of "physical" is that it must be alien to the "spiritual" and v-v.
>
>My 2 cents.
Ronald L. Troxel, Ph.D.
Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies
1340 Van Hise Hall
1220 Linden Dr.
Madison, WI 53706
-
Paul on Resurrection,
Sheila E. McGinn, Ph.D., 04/06/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Paul on Resurrection, Abrciw, 04/06/1999
- Re: Paul on Resurrection, Markus McDowell, 04/07/1999
- Re: Paul on Resurrection, Ronald Troxel, 04/07/1999
- Re: Paul on Resurrection, Ronald Troxel, 04/07/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.