cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-uk mailing list
List archive
- From: Jordan Hatcher <jordan AT twitchgamer.net>
- To: Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org>
- Cc: cc-uk <cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:26:30 -0600
The change you mention is aimed to address some concerns over reputation similar to moral rights aspects of copyright.
I believe that this is one of the differences between the 2.5 generic licence and the 2.0 generic licence put out by CC last year. Because E and W was drafted when the 2.0 generic version was the standard, that element is not reflected in the 2.0 E and W. I believe that there are plans to update this licence accordingly, but I am sure that someone from the team can answer this better than I.
The Scottish licence, drafted slightly later in time than the EandW licence, complies with the new 2.5 standard:
See section 2.3
"But, if what you are publishing or distributing is a Derivative Work or a Collective Work, you must remove any of these credits if you are asked to do so by the Licensor and if it is practicable to do so."
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/scotland/legalcode
Thanks!
Jordan Hatcher
jordan AT twitchgamer.net
On 21 Mar, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
Hi.
In the generic BY-SA license, there is section in clause 4a that
allows a contributor to demand the removal of their name from
derivative work.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcode
"4. [...] a. [...] If You create a Collective Work, upon notice from
any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the
Collective Work any credit as required by clause 4(c), as requested.
If You create a Derivative Work, upon notice from any Licensor You
must, to the extent practicable, remove from the Derivative Work any
credit as required by clause 4(c), as requested."
There does not seem to be an equivalent section in the England &
Wales 2.5 BY-SA .
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/uk/legalcode
I assume it would be in the "You must:" section. Should this be in
the licence? Its absence seems to be a deviation from the original.
- Rob.
_______________________________________________
Cc-uk mailing list
Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk
-
[Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution,
Rob Myers, 03/21/2006
- Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution, Jordan Hatcher, 03/21/2006
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution,
copyleftmedia, 03/21/2006
- Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution, Rob Myers, 03/22/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution,
Prodromos Tsiavos, 03/22/2006
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution,
Jonathan Mitchell, 03/22/2006
- Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution, Prodromos Tsiavos, 03/22/2006
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Licence Bug? Removal of Attribution,
Jonathan Mitchell, 03/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.