cc-nz AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand discussion
List archive
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia
- From: Ian Thomson <ithomson.nz AT gmail.com>
- To: Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand discussion <cc-nz AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:25:34 +1300
Oops. Thanks Richard.
I missed the combined submission.
Thanks for the review.
Re your comments about the US verses the UK/Aus approach was validated in another submission I was reading from Ericsson (my old employer) where they said the file sharing (assumingly illegal) stands at 14% of users in the US, but 34% in Aus. They cited a general availability of affordable fresh content as the main factor.
At the University of the South Pacific where I work, there is a strong understanding and respect of copyright, but generally the region has a poor record in respecting copyright.
OER's will be very important for education in the Pacific, cutting the cost of text books and hopefully making Education for All more realisable.
Ian
Ian (et al),
There is a submission from Universities Australia, which represents the 39 universities, just as Universities NZ represents our 8. The submission therefore represents a united front. Sydney’s individual submission is specifically noted as being alongside the Universities Australia one, commenting further on specific issues.
I haven’t read the full submission from Universities Australia, just the summary, but it broadly says things I hope Universities NZ will say when it submits to the NZ copyright review in due course. I sit on the UNZ copyright group representing Otago but hasten to add this is my view, not that of UNZ necessarily.
The gist of the Universities Australia submission is that there needs to be a more flexible, technology-independent system for educational institutions to be able to use copyright material in ‘fair’ ways that would. In other words what they’re asking for is something more akin to the US system of fair use, which is driven by the famous four factors; our legislation is based on UK law and is similar to Australia’s in that is based around specifics, which can be incredibly difficult to interpret in each unique case (e.g. you can use text from XYZ if it’s a collected edition over 25 years old or more, but not the photos, which were used with permission by the editors, and taken on a Wednesday by a man wearing a straw hat, etc.). A more flexible regime would be great here too, from my perspective: we have a culture of fear around fair dealing which means no-one really relies on it when they probably could. If I want to critique a graph in an article why not allow use of it in my research publication, when my inclusion of it is non-profit and only really likely to increase reading of the source?
Regards
Richard
Richard White | Subject Matter Expert, Student Management System Project & University Copyright Officer
Darwin House | 61 Clyde Street | University of Otago | Dunedin | New Zealand
Te Whare o Darwin | 61 Clyde Street | Te Whare Wānanga o Otago | Ōtepoti | Aotearoa
richard.white AT otago.ac.nz | rkawhite on Twitter | Copyright info for staff & students | Open Otago blog | LinkedIn
From: cc-nz-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:cc-nz-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Ian Thomson
Sent: Monday, 14 January 2013 1:24 p.m.
To: Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand discussion
Subject: Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia
Thanks Shees (and Mark)
I find it very curious that there are only 2 or 3 submissions from Education institutions (and only one from a University)
IanOn 14 January 2013 12:15, Mark Crookston <Mark.Crookston AT dia.govt.nz> wrote:
Apologies for cross-posting….
Sheesh,
Submissions to Australian Law Reform Commission Issues Paper entitled "Copyright and the Digital Economy" around the planned reform of the Copyright Act number 280 organisations and 278 individuals, and counting……..
http://www.alrc.gov.au/inquiries/copyright-and-digital-economy/submissions-received-alrc
A quick skim of some of the library and archive submissions makes quite good reading.
Mark
Mark Crookston
Digital Collection Strategy Leader
The Alexander Turnbull Library
National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa
The Department of Internal Affairs Te Tari Taiwhenua
DDI: +64 4 4704492
_______________________________________________
cc-nz mailing list
cc-nz AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-nz
Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand
http://www.creativecommons.org.nz/
--
Ian Thomson
e-Learning Fellow, USP
Suva Fiji
Phone +679 8640344
Wellington New Zealand
Phone +64 (0)22 0946411
_______________________________________________
cc-nz mailing list
cc-nz AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-nz
Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand
http://www.creativecommons.org.nz/
--
Ian Thomson
e-Learning Fellow, USP
Suva Fiji
Phone +679 8640344
Wellington New Zealand
Phone +64 (0)22 0946411
-
[Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Mark Crookston, 01/13/2013
- Re: [Cc-nz] [NZ-Libs] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia, Brian Flaherty, 01/13/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Ian Thomson, 01/13/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Richard White, 01/13/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Ian Thomson, 01/13/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Richard White, 01/13/2013
- Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia, Leigh Blackall, 01/14/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Richard White, 01/13/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Ian Thomson, 01/13/2013
-
Re: [Cc-nz] Submissions on Copyright Reform in Australia,
Richard White, 01/13/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.