cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work
List archive
- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>
- To: cc-metadata <cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Short notice mini music metadata summit summary
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:16:07 -0700
2004.04.13
Attendees (order of appearance):
Rob Kaye http://mayhem-chaos.net
Mike Linksvayer http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#21
Christopher Allen http://www.lifewithalacrity.com
John Buckman http://blogs.magnatune.com/buckman
Neeru Paharia http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#16
Glenn Otis Brown http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#10
Kevin Marks http://epeus.blogspot.com
IRC:
Jim Garrison http://gnomoradio.org
and a number of lurkers
Bad: completely failed to stay on topic (in part due to my poorly
defining topics), no firm technical decisions reached.
Good: lots of valuable "customer" feedback from Magnatune, lots of use
cases that can help drive technical descisions in the near future.
Brief notes on each agenda item:
Signing RDF
- CA not impressed with current state of xml digsig tools
- CA had proposed hashing foaf with third party secret
* more research needed
Remix Ready
- Actually two scenarios
- work has "source" available (e.g., individual tracks)
- a file is a "high quality" or uncompressed version
* need to propose terms for each
Tipjar
- (JB) might want to tip publisher
- that's ok, use dc:publisher in addition to dc:creator
- rel="tipjar", there is no rel values authority (KM)
* CC will adopt RSN
License Buyout
- (JB) want to flag certain terms "fair commercial", e.g.,
nondiscriminatory, nonrefusal
- (JB) artists want three items published: artist contact,
booking/concert info, and legal representation
* CA to write up proposal
Purchase
- only briefly mentioned, simple URL should suffice
* need to propose term or find existing
Abstract Work versus Instance Licensing and Metadata
- work metadata can easier refer to specific encodings, if
such info is available (not in the case of an abstract work
catalog like MusicBrainz)
- UI and license problem, not really a metadata problem
- JG notes that Gnomoradio metadata splits abstract and
instance info
That's about as far in the agenda as we got. Contrary to my hopes, there was lots of non-agenda background filling, philosophy, and licensing discussion. Ah well. We all learned a lot. Lessig's
book signing/reception was entertaining.
Wiki:
http://www.socialtext.net/musicmetadata/
IRC log:
http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/irc/musicmetadata/2004-04-13.html
--
Mike Linksvayer
http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#21
-
Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford),
Mike Linksvayer, 04/09/2004
- Re: Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford), Mike Linksvayer, 04/09/2004
-
Re: Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford),
Lucas Gonze, 04/10/2004
- Re: Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford), tom poe, 04/10/2004
-
Re: Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford),
Mike Linksvayer, 04/12/2004
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
- Short notice mini music metadata summit summary, Mike Linksvayer, 04/19/2004
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford),
Evan Prodromou, 04/14/2004
- Re: Short notice mini music metadata summit (Tuesday April 13, Stanford), Mike Linksvayer, 04/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.