cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work
List archive
- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>
- To: cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: some detailed questions about CC RDF
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:18:21 -0800
Lucas Gonze wrote:
Answer: it's not defined at http://web.resource.org/cc/ but at a child page from there, http://web.resource.org/cc/schema.rdf.
FWIW the schema is also embedded in a comment at <http://web.resource.org/cc>.
In the explanatory text below that there is this --
"dc:source, cc:derivativeWork
A Work that the resource was derived from."
What's the difference between dc:source and cc:derivativeWork?
It turns out that cc:derivativeWork describes a child of the current resource, not a parent, and dc:source describes a parent "reference to a resource from which the present resource is derived" according to Dublin Core.
I don't know why cc:derivativeWork was created. AFAIK it is unused. Unless someone has a compelling argument for using cc:derivativeWork I'd suggest sticking to dc:source, as you have in the CC SMIL draft. Aaron Swartz may have some insight.
--
Mike Linksvayer
http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#21
-
Re: CC LicenseLib - a .NET library for Creative Commons License Metadata,
admin, 10/28/2003
-
some detailed questions about CC RDF,
Lucas Gonze, 10/29/2003
-
Re: some detailed questions about CC RDF,
Lucas Gonze, 10/29/2003
- Re: some detailed questions about CC RDF, Mike Linksvayer, 10/29/2003
-
Re: some detailed questions about CC RDF,
Lucas Gonze, 10/29/2003
-
some detailed questions about CC RDF,
Lucas Gonze, 10/29/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.