cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution
- From: Federico Morando <federico.morando AT gmail.com>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:06:11 +0200
On 19/08/2014 15:27, Sarah Pearson
wrote:
My general comment is just: +1 to Mike's analysis. However, more for theoretical than for practical purposes, I would be very interested in knowing the feedback of the FAL stewards to the aforementioned question. (In other words, given a CC-BY-SA 4.0 licensed derivative work of a FAL original work, is CC-BY-SA the only relevant license from the downstream licensee point of view?) Best, Federico (CC Italy lead) |
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Engel Nyst, 08/04/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Sarah Pearson, 08/04/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, 08/04/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Engel Nyst, 08/18/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Sarah Pearson, 08/19/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution, Federico Morando, 08/23/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Sarah Pearson, 08/19/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Engel Nyst, 08/18/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Melanie Dulong de Rosnay, 08/04/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Sarah Pearson, 08/04/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.