cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution
- From: Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:25:26 -0500
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Luis Villa <luis AT tieguy.org> wrote:
(That presumes that use "in the wild" matters; I think it should but I can understand if that makes CC somewhat nervous.)
We certainly agree that what happens "in the wild" is an important consideration. The larger the disconnect between what the licenses say and what happens in practice, the less relevant the licenses are.
-
[cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Sarah Pearson, 07/24/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Mike Linksvayer, 07/25/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Luis Villa, 07/27/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution, Sarah Pearson, 07/29/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Luis Villa, 07/27/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] input requested: FAL/BY-SA compatibility - attribution,
Mike Linksvayer, 07/25/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.