Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Tyng-Ruey Chuang <trc AT iis.sinica.edu.tw>]

I echo the view that attribution need not be a prerequisite when
considering whether a license is one-way compatible to a CC BY-SA
license. As Kat mentioned, public domain dedication (like CC0)
does not demand attribution. There also exists (though retired)
CC SA 1.0 license which does not have an attribution element.

> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/

For me, it will be not natural to say, just because of the difference
in attribution requirement, neither CC0 nor CC SA 1.0 is one-way
compatible to a CC BY-SA license.

best,
Tyng-Ruey

On 5/4/14 8:17 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Francesco Poli 
> <invernomuto AT paranoici.org <mailto:invernomuto AT paranoici.org>> wrote:
>
>     Personally, I think there should be adequate room for differences in
>     the attribution requirement (if such a requirement is needed at all in
>     the candidate license). Otherwise it may happen that no license will
>     ever be considered as Compatible...
>
>
> I suspect Francesco is right and this will have to be a case-by-case 
> analysis. If you don't want to do a case-by-case analysis, the right way 
> to go about this is probably to analyze and compare the requirements of 
> all the licenses you're currently considering for this - e.g., GPLs, 
> OGLs, etc. Without that sort of systematic analysis this question 
> probably can't go anywhere.
>
> Luis
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> List info and archives at 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
>
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community