cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #4: vanity licenses
- From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #4: vanity licenses
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 19:09:15 +0200
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:20:39 -0700 Kat Walsh wrote:
> The minimum compatibility criteria currently do not preclude “vanity
> licenses” from being named compatible.
[...]
> Because
> CC believes license proliferation is harmful to the commons, we may
> reconsider this policy if it increases license proliferation by
> encouraging others to create vanity licenses that may be deemed
> compatible.
I agree that license proliferation is really bad and my gut feeling is
strongly against "vanity licenses".
However, in some rare cases, fighting against a "vanity license" may be
counterproductive.
I would therefore recommend to decide on a case-by-case basis.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpNcmVdMDwky.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #4: vanity licenses,
Francesco Poli, 05/01/2014
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #4: vanity licenses, Mike Linksvayer, 05/02/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #4: vanity licenses, Luis Villa, 05/03/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.