cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- From: Kat Walsh <kat AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 11:53:37 -0700
I let this message through, but further replies on this topic should
go to cc-community rather than cc-licenses so that this list can stay
on the topic of 4.0.
(As others mention earlier in the thread, CC does consider the ND and
SA elements incompatible, and will not be pursuing an option that
combines them; the other thoughts are more suitable for the community
list!)
Cheers,
Kat
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Heather Morrison <hgmorris AT sfu.ca> wrote:
> On 28-Apr-13, at 9:36 AM, Kim Tucker wrote:
>
> Creative Commons license users need to free themselves from the
> "property" mindset and disassociate the issues of freedom and price...
>
> Comment: while Kim's argument is in opposition to NC, I would argue
> that granting blanket commercial uses also reflects a "property"
> mindset. For that matter, all CC licenses reflect a "property" mindset
> - CC-BY reflects a proactive claim of moral rights, and even CC-0
> involves waiving rights.
>
> This is one concern that I have about CC licenses overall - the
> process of thinking about intellectual property every time we create
> something, reinforces the concept of intellectual property.
>
> For this reason I am hoping that CC can be a bridge to a world where
> we think less about ownership of ideas and creative works, a necessary
> stage to break the ridiculous concept of automatic copyright. There
> may always be some works for which CC licensing is the best option,
> but open sharing with broad fair dealing rights and limitations on the
> need for things like attribution for most works would be optimal.
>
> This is more a question of how and whether CC licenses are used rather
> than wording of the license per se, but perhaps useful context for
> framing plans on wording of the license.
>
> best,
>
> Dr. Heather Morrison
> The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics
> http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> List info and archives at
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
>
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
--
Kat Walsh, Counsel, Creative Commons
IM/IRC/@/etc: mindspillage * phone: please email first
Help us support the commons: https://creativecommons.net/donate/
CC does not and cannot give legal advice. If you need legal advice,
please consult your attorney.
-
Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option,
Heather Morrison, 05/06/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] NoDerivs and Sharealike are not opposites; should be a ND-SA option, Kat Walsh, 05/08/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.