cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all.

From: Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>
To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all.
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:39:41 -0400

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:48 PM, sebastian nielsen
<nielsen.sebastian AT gmail.com> wrote:
> the problem of allowing a derative by-nc-sa work to be released as by-sa is
> that a commercial user then can change color of one pixel, then it become
> derative and the "noncommercial" clause is bypassed.

You say that like it's a bad thing ;).

> I understand that nc is a restriction, but its a very small restriction
> compared to nd or Non-CC license.

I definitely disagree with that. An NC license is pretty much useless.

Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all., drew Roberts, 08/01/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all., sebastian nielsen, 08/01/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all., Anthony, 08/01/2012
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all., pcreso, 08/01/2012
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all., Anthony, 08/01/2012
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Suggestion for CC 4.0: Make a universal license that works for all., Gregor Hagedorn, 08/01/2012