cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa

From: Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>
To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:30:33 -0400

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Francesco Poli
<invernomuto AT paranoici.org> wrote:
> As I have already repeatedly stated in the past, I think that having
> one-way GPL-compatibility for CC-by-sa-v4.0 is of paramount importance.

Two-way compatibility would be much better. One-way compatibility is
unfair. It goes directly against the rule to share alike.

[cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Arne Babenhauserheide, 06/08/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Christopher Allan Webber, 06/15/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Arne Babenhauserheide, 06/17/2012
    - Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Christopher Allan Webber, 06/18/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Francesco Poli, 06/16/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Anthony, 06/16/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Chitu Okoli, 06/17/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] by-nc-sa draft and GPL compatibility of by-sa, Gisle Hannemyr, 06/17/2012