Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Defining Non Commercial/ Commercial Rights Reserved for clarity

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew Rens <andrewrens AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Defining Non Commercial/ Commercial Rights Reserved for clarity
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:32:08 -0400



On 17 April 2012 10:49, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2012 17:17:35 Andrew Rens wrote:
> On 16 April 2012 12:11, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 April 2012 22:39:59 Anthony wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Andrew Rens <andrewrens AT gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:

> Bartering is by definition not "intended for
> or directed towards private monetary compensation". The question that then
> arises is whether all bartering (other than of copyright works) is
> "intended for or directed toward commercial advantage".

I would think it is more is *some* bartering (other than of copyright
works) "intended for or directed toward commercial advantage".

If some is then bartering is not allowed in all cases.
I don't think so.

4.b reads in full: "You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation. The exchange of the Work for other copyrighted works by means of digital file-sharing or otherwise shall not be considered to be intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation, provided there is no payment of any monetary compensation in connection with the exchange of copyrighted works."

So if you exercise a right granted in Section 3 such as distributing the work in a barter, and that bartering transaction is not "primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage" then that specific bartering is allowed by v3.


Explicit might be better.

I think so


Andrew


--
Andrew Rens

ex africa semper aliquid novi (http://aliquidnovi.org)





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page