Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Diane Peters <diane AT creativecommons.org>]

Hi Drew,

Thanks for raising this.   As you know, BY-SA is derived from BY-NC-SA Draft 1, but with NC provisions removed and the relevant SA-related provisions added.  We should have thought to make that clearer, and have now delineated it all here: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Draft_1#Provisions_for_other_Licenses_in_the_Suite.

Prior to publication of Draft 1, we weren't aware of proposed changes to the definition of Creative Commons Compatible License (now simply "Compatible License"), which is the central addition to create BY-SA from BY-NC-SA.

Thanks again,

Diane

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:23 AM, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:

I ask because the released NC containing draft can use NC to restrict/protect
things that the Free BY-SA will need to protect in other ways if it attempts
to do so.

all the best,

drew
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses

In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community

--