cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] DRM

From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] DRM
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:41:44 -0500

On Friday 13 January 2012 15:22:55 Kent Mewhort wrote:
> (of course, it
> is always open for the original author to only distribute TPM'd versions in
> the first place, but in this case I don't see why such an author would even
> release under CC at all).

Well, one reason is for the positive buzz without the correspondent
contribution.

On the whole though I see you main point re BY-SA versus the others.

all the best,

drew

[cc-licenses] DRM, Mike Linksvayer, 01/11/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Francesco Poli, 01/12/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Kent Mewhort, 01/13/2012
    - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, drew Roberts, 01/20/2012
      - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Rob Myers, 01/24/2012
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Tim Cas, 01/24/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Rob Myers, 01/14/2012
    - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Francesco Poli, 01/21/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, David Chart, 01/13/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, Rob Myers, 01/13/2012
  - Re: [cc-licenses] DRM, jonathon, 01/18/2012