cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Kerrick Long <me AT kerricklong.com>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:58:12 -0600
Hello,
I noticed that there are conflicting proposals (1 and 2) on the 4.0 NC wiki page, one to make the license more conservative and one to make it more liberal. I also noticed that proposal 7 was about to repalce NC with a NonProfit license. Why not split NC into two separate Creative Commons licenses?
NonCommercial could keep the more conservative definition, and NonProfit could keep the liberal definition. For example, it could be clarified that the use of a licensed work on an ad-supported website is disallowed under NC, but allowed under NP. (Of course, if it seems better, NP could be conservative and NC could be liberal.) Could we make this an official proposal to be considered for 4.0?
-
[cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Kerrick Long, 01/12/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Gregor Hagedorn, 01/12/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Ben Finney, 01/12/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Kerrick Long, 01/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Gregor Hagedorn, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Whelan, Darius, 01/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, jonathon, 01/18/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
jmp, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Greg London, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Kerrick Long, 01/13/2012
- [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial, Gregor Hagedorn, 01/21/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Kerrick Long, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Greg London, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Kerrick Long, 01/13/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Ben Finney, 01/12/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] 4.0 NonCommercial,
Gregor Hagedorn, 01/12/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.