cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?

From: "Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves" <justivo AT gmail.com>
To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:10:19 +0100

On 8/27/07, Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
> > It's probably unnecessary -- the CC licenses already allow for
> > derivatives to fall under future licenses.
>
> Licenses version 2.0 and greater including the ShareAlike term do. It
> isn't relevant for non-SA licenses, which don't mandate release of
> derivatives under a particular license.

Alright. Thank you, Terry and Mike.

-Ivo

[cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/25/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Terry Hancock, 08/26/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Mike Linksvayer, 08/26/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/26/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Evan Prodromou, 08/27/2007
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/27/2007
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Mike Linksvayer, 08/27/2007
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Evan Prodromou, 08/27/2007
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/27/2007