cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?

From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:32:34 -0500

Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:
> Recently, an outsider proposed that it was perhaps better if we
> required that contributions be under "Creative Commons Attribution
> License 3.0 or any later version published by Creative Commons".
> Something akin to what some GPLv2 projects do.

It's probably unnecessary -- the CC licenses already allow for
derivatives to fall under future licenses.

Cheers,
Terry

IANAL, etc.

--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com

[cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/25/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Terry Hancock, 08/26/2007
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Mike Linksvayer, 08/26/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/26/2007
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Evan Prodromou, 08/27/2007
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/27/2007
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Mike Linksvayer, 08/27/2007
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Evan Prodromou, 08/27/2007
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Is something like "version 3.0 or any later version" allowed?, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, 08/27/2007