Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Luis Villa" <luis AT tieguy.org>
  • To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NC considered harmful? Prove it...
  • Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:01:05 -0500

On 3/7/07, drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 09:39 pm, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,

> >
> > Now I want to prove it. You know, with *evidence*. ;-)
> >
> > No facile "well it's not 'free' so it's not in the 'commons'" word
> > games. I need actual empirical evidence that NC (including NC-SA) works
> > do not get reused, improved, disseminated, etc. as efficiently as By or
> > By-SA works do.
>
> [Sorry, this is too short, deserves a lot more, but I'm busy ATM :/
>
>There are some variants of open source software
> licenses with NC terms, but they aren't popular.

Huh? You have lost me there. Can you explain and give examples? Isn't this
impossible by definition?

I use the term 'open source' loosely here; not OSI-approved, but
rather in the broader family of source-available software copyright
licenses, some of which are similar in spirit to NC. (Search for
'commercial' in http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ for some
examples. You've never heard of most of them, which I think helps
prove the point- projects which use them tend to die or relicense.)

> I disagree with Greg's suggestion that this is psychological; if
> people didn't want to contribute under restrictive licenses then the
> BSD and Apache licenses would be much more commong than they currently
> are. They aren't, so we have to look for non-psychological reasons.

I am not sure I follow this line of thinking. Can you explain this as well?
(No pressure.)

Greg says:

"Well, it's based in part in an understanding of human psychology.
Why do people contribute to a Free project?
The answer seems to reflect a notion that most people who contribute
to Free projects don't want to contribute their time and energy to
something that is restricted as much as CC-NC is."

While Greg wasn't completely clear, he seemed to be arguing that other
things being equal, people would contribute to projects under less
restrictive licenses.

GPL is a more restrictive license than BSD or Apache, and yet is
vastly more popular, so I think Greg's contention (if I understand it
correctly) is incorrect.

Hope that clarifies-
Luis




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page