cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license
- From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann AT redhat.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:21:35 -0500
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:47 +0000, Emerson Clarke wrote:
> Dana,
>
> Thanks, i was actually looking at the microsoft licenses this morning.
> But as you suggested, they do not go down well with the open source
> community.
The problem with the Microsoft licenses is not that they come from
Microsoft. It's that Microsoft has not submitted the licenses to the
Open Source Initiative's license approval process, so they have not be
discussed, so they cannot be approved by the OSI board, and therefore
they are not OSI-approved licenses. If and when Microsoft submits a
license to the process, they will get the same fair hearing that any
other submission would receive, and the invitation to do so remains
open. Until then, the open source community (or at least this open
source community member) will take a wait-and-see approach.
Michael Tiemann
President, Open Source Initiative
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license
, (continued)
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Henri Sivonen, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, rob, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Henri Sivonen, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
James Grimmelmann, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Michael Tiemann, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Dana Powers, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Michael Tiemann, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Michael Tiemann, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, drew Roberts, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Ciaran O'Riordan, 02/06/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Dana Powers, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Mia Garlick, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Mark Brown, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Michael Tiemann, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, drew Roberts, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Michael Tiemann, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license, drew Roberts, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
James Grimmelmann, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] open source non commercial license,
Emerson Clarke, 02/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.