Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Wednesday 29 November 2006 05:32 pm, Francesco Poli wrote:
big snip
>
> Wait one second: are you claiming that CC-v3.0draft anti-DRM clause is
> equivalent to GPLv3draft2 one?
big snip
>
>
> Does the same hold for the CC-v3.0draft anti-DRM clause?

Let's see if we can ask a question here...

Is everyone who wants the anti-tpm clause, and does not want the parallel 
distribution option, ok with the parallel distribution option so long as it 
only applies where anyone can freely apply the drm for the platform in 
question?

Unless someone can convince me otherwise, I would accepth that as a 
compromise. (If I worded my meaning properly at least.)

all the best,

drew
-- 
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
http://www.nanowrimo.org/index.php
861,535,038 words and counting.