cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Roger Chrisman <roger AT rogerchrisman.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:02:45 -0800
Jim Sowers wrote:
> Nevertheless, I think the line at the bottom of the deed that reads
> "This is a human-readable summary ..." is unfortunate.
I agree with Jim. That line should be changed. It is time to change it.
"This is a summary" says it better and more appropriately.
Someone who can change it, please do.
Thank You!
Roger Chrisman :-) http://wikigogy.org - free resources
for teachers of English as a second or foreign language
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Jim Sowers, 11/21/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans, Bob Morris, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Jim Sowers, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Terry Hancock, 11/22/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Jim Sowers, 11/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans, Pete Rabjohns, 11/22/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Jim Sowers, 11/22/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Terry Hancock, 11/22/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Jim Sowers, 11/21/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans, Roger Chrisman, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans,
Andres Guadamuz, 11/22/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Lawyers aren't humans, Jim Sowers, 11/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.