cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Terry Hancock <hancock AT anansispaceworks.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] "mere aggregation"
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:46:46 -0500
Mark Jarrell wrote:
I think fair use still applies to CC licenses--they are less
restrictive licenses, but CC material is just copyrighted material.
So I guess you could probably use the CC-By-SA picture like you would
any other picture.
Yeah, I thought of that, but I'm not reviewing the CC-By-SA work, and I'm copying it entirely, so that doesn't quite work (the ARR works I'm quoting are just tiny pieces of a much larger work, and I am directly discussing their meaning). The CC-By-SA work is more of a conceptual illustration, so I'm using it directly, not under fair use. Or so I think, anyway.
I think after all, I need to separate them, and only combine the ARR/Fair Use screencaps with CC-By work. That turns out not to be so onerous (only one figure is badly affected by that choice).
It was a funny problem, because I had really considered it. My *article* will be CC-By-SA, so it didn't really occur to me that there'd be a problem using By-SA images (and there won't be as long as they are independent from ARR images).
Thanks!
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
-
[cc-licenses] "mere aggregation",
Terry Hancock, 10/17/2006
-
[cc-licenses] "Collective" vs "Derivative" was Re: "mere aggregation",
Terry Hancock, 10/18/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] "Collective" vs "Derivative" was Re: "mere aggregation", Greg London, 10/18/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [cc-licenses] "mere aggregation",
Mark Jarrell, 10/19/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] "mere aggregation", Terry Hancock, 10/20/2006
-
[cc-licenses] "Collective" vs "Derivative" was Re: "mere aggregation",
Terry Hancock, 10/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.