cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:47:01 -0400
On Saturday 30 September 2006 11:17 pm, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-30-09 at 22:36 -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
> > > So, a side question on the DRM issue: considering that the requirements
> > > of the non-copyleft Attribution license don't extend to Derivative
> > > Works -- it is the most liberal of Creative Commons licenses -- are
> > > people as passionate about maintaining the anti-DRM requirement in that
> > > license?
> >
> > I wouldn't know, perhaps. I only care really about BY-SA and BY licenses,
> > in that order. What CC chooses to do with the others doesn't really
> > bother me that much. (Well, when it comes to the traditional CC content
> > licenses.)
>
> The Attribution license is also known as the "by" license.
Oops, I know that, my bad. So, to answer, properly, no, am am not AS
passionate about maintaining the anti-DRM requirement in the BY license, but
I would like to see it there as well. Do what you like with the ND and NC
licenses. (In all honesty, the only one that I see directly concerning me as
an author, if I had my druthers, is the BY-SA licnese. I say if I had my
druthers as I keep wanting to take part in what is going on a ccmixter and CC
doesn't allow the use of the BY-SA license over there. So, I am reduced to
choosing which of my works I am willing to put under a BY license or shoosing
to apply the NC option to my works which I seriously dislike.) [Hey CC how
about running a parallel "freemixter" site which only allows BY and BY-SA
works? All works there would be freely mixable.]
Just had a new thought while writing that last paragraph. The NC option will
forbid Greg's bad Dave from getting his monopoly. At least until some
non-profit Dave comes up with a DRM system. For profit corporations will not
be able to put DRM on their players. (If they are the only ones who can put
DRM on for their players.)
>
> ~Evan
all the best,
drew
--
(da idea man)
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/145261
Record a song and you might win $1,000.00
http://www.ourmedia.org/user/17145
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Nic Suzor, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license, Terry Hancock, 10/02/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Terry Hancock, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Greg London, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Mark Brown, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Greg London, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Mark Brown, 10/03/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Greg London, 10/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license, Mark Brown, 10/03/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Greg London, 10/03/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Mark Brown, 10/03/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Greg London, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Mark Brown, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Greg London, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution license,
Nic Suzor, 10/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.