cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban

From: "Greg London" <teloscorbin AT gmail.com>
To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:40:57 -0400

On 8/15/06, MJ Ray <mjr AT phonecoop.coop> wrote:

Such things should not
be in the most permissive CC licence.

That would seem right.

I think the TPM and DRM clauses are only needed
in the ShareAlike license, since that's the only license
that is intended to protect a project from proprietary
forking and other gambits.

And the idea is to prevent DRM or other TPM from
being used to take a work or its derivative private.

---
Wikipedia and the Great Sneetches War
http://www.somerightsreserved.org

[cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban, MJ Ray, 08/15/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban, rob, 08/15/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban, MJ Ray, 08/17/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban, Greg London, 08/15/2006
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban, Rob Myers, 08/16/2006
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Remove the TPM-ban, Greg London, 08/16/2006