Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] NonDerivative NonCommercial Licenses

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] NonDerivative NonCommercial Licenses
  • Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:28:10 -0500

On Wednesday 29 March 2006 08:52 am, Greg London wrote:
> Pure copyleft, such as GNU-GPL or CC-SA, are the ideal
> license for a gift-economy project, in that these
> licenses give the project the best chances for success.

Greg, I may have been the one who put the question that sidetracked the
thread.

It is just that not being careful with you examples can lead people who find
mistakes in them to discount the other things you have to say. Also, people
have seen so much fud thrown around in this area that they are less likely to
let incorrect history pass as fact.

Now, you will get no argument from me that a pure copyleft licence is the
best
licence, and for my money, not just for what you call gift economy projects.

I have never fully bought into the gift economy explanation even from years
ago when ESR was putting forth the idea (he is the first person I know who
put it forth in relation to Free Software and the GPL, I don't know if he
originated the thought in that context) as I have never found it to match up
with my motivations and thinking. However, if it helps people to get a graps
on how and why the copyleft licences can work, I am not one to make a big
deal of that issue.

> It prevents proprietary forking, and it prevents
> a commercial forks of the project from competing with
> the original gift-economy version of the project.

If I understand you correctly, I do take issue with this though. One of the
key features of the GPL is that it does indeed allow for forks of the
project, commercial or volunteer driven, it just requires what it requires.
Given what it requires though, the original project can take back and
incorporate the improvements made by the fork. So, it does discourage
"unnecesary" forking. I think. Which is a good thing. I think.

all the best,

drew
--
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/145261
Record a song and you might win $1,000.00
http://www.ourmedia.org/user/17145





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page