Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Patrick Peiffer <peiffer.patrick AT gmail.com>]

Hi,

I guess open licencensing would help this building method. The
"patterns", structures that will be developped are worth something as
in "creative value". This value of course associated with cavetats
like copyright: no right to copy, no right to use commercially, no
right to change, etc. This seems to me a problem when trying to get
this new method off the ground, especially over a ten-years period.
The solution indeed would be an open-content licence, like a cc-by-sa,
maybe a cc-by-nc-nd for a client who wants sth unique... the sky's the
limit.

for the second question, no idea.

btw: could you translate the strange scripts, can't read them.

regs, patrick (ianal)

On 22/01/06, Per Corell <per.corell AT privat.dk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I am promoting a new building method, want everyone to use it spended a 
> decade develobing it so it work better than any of today's methods ,what's 
> the gain publishing it under these licenses ?
>
> Is it any idea if I want this technology to be avaible to be able to make a 
> patent irelevant , could a designer spending a decade develobing a sweet 
> new tool make any use of these licenses ?
>
> P.C.
>
> http://home20.inet.tele.dk/h-3d/kineserier.jpg
>
> http://home20.inet.tele.dk/h-3d/
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>