Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Friday 10 June 2005 08:40 am, Rob Myers wrote:
> On Friday, June 10, 2005, at 01:34PM, Evan Prodromou <evan AT bad.dynu.ca> 
wrote:
> >Yes, I realize this is kind of a pain, but I believe it's the way the
> >license works.
>
> I've seen some people propose using langauge similar to that suggested for
> GPL licensing, so for BY_SA that would be something like:
>
> "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike
> License; either version 2.5 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> version."
>
> I don't know whether this works or not, though. I am not a lawyer.

Unless I am mistaken, it would not work as the license claims to be the 
entire 
agreement.
>
> - Rob.

all the best,

drew

-- 
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22