cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:40:07 +0100
On Friday, June 10, 2005, at 01:34PM, Evan Prodromou <evan AT bad.dynu.ca> wrote:
>Yes, I realize this is kind of a pain, but I believe it's the way the
>license works.
I've seen some people propose using langauge similar to that suggested for
GPL licensing, so for BY_SA that would be something like:
"This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike
License; either version 2.5 of the License, or (at your option) any later
version."
I don't know whether this works or not, though. I am not a lawyer.
- Rob.
-
2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
James Byers, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
Evan Prodromou, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
Rob Myers, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
drew Roberts, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
Mike Linksvayer, 06/10/2005
- Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process, Mark Ivey, 06/10/2005
- Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process, Evan Prodromou, 06/11/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
Mike Linksvayer, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
drew Roberts, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
Rob Myers, 06/10/2005
-
Re: 2.0 to 2.5 Upgrade Process,
Evan Prodromou, 06/10/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.