cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Improbulus" <improbulus+cc-l1 AT gmail.com>
- To: <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:53:34 +0100
It seems to me that Attribution Non-commercial
Share Alike is the closest to what I'm looking for, but there is one point which
is unclear to me, and I'd be very grateful if someone would be so kind as to
clear it up please?
In relation to derivatives, I'd be happy for people
to build on my work. But if they have to release their work on the same terms,
surely this just means that anyone who then builds upon that derivative work
only needs to credit the creator of that derivative work (and get their
permission for commercial use etc), and doesn't have to credit me or get my
permission as well?
In other words am I right in thinking there's only
one "generation" of permission/attribution that's needed for share alike, and
you don't have to go back to previous/original authors?
If the first derivative work is very heavily based
on your work, how do you prevent this generation upon generation dilution of
your right to be involved, which could of course get worse if someone else
produces another derivative work based largely on the first derivative work,
etc?
Would the only way be to forbid derivatives
altogether?
Many thanks in advance
Improbulus.
|
-
Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question,
Improbulus, 04/20/2005
- Re: Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question, Greg London, 04/20/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question,
Improbulus, 04/20/2005
-
RE: Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question,
Evan Prodromou, 04/20/2005
- Re: Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question, Robin Millette, 04/20/2005
-
RE: Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike - question,
Evan Prodromou, 04/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.