cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Matthew Haughey <matt AT haughey.com>
- To: Evan Prodromou <evan.prodromou AT gmail.com>, Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:34:12 -0800
On Apr 1, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
The problem is that Wiki 0.5 and Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 both have license elements Attribution and ShareAlike. Unlike the previous examples, though, they don't differ in version or language or intended legal regime; they just differ in the details of Attribution. This makes their relationship kind of unique.
The problem goes away if the wiki 0.5 license becomes by-sa 2.1 or 2.5 or something like that, correct?
Matt
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Evan Prodromou, 04/01/2005
- Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta, Matthew Haughey, 04/01/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Greg London, 04/01/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Evan Prodromou, 04/02/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Greg London, 04/02/2005
- Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta, Greg London, 04/02/2005
- Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta, Mike Linksvayer, 04/03/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Greg London, 04/02/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Evan Prodromou, 04/02/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Brian Schack, 04/03/2005
- Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta, Greg London, 04/03/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Brian Schack, 04/03/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Greg London, 04/03/2005
- Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta, wiki_tomos, 04/04/2005
-
Re: Wiki license 0.5 beta,
Greg London, 04/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.