Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: public domain question

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gottfried Hofmann <toddd AT mypse.goracer.de>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: public domain question
  • Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:58:32 +0100


Anything that "doesn't allow" something is not free as in freedom.
See, the difference is "free speech" is free as in a commons.
Free speech allows you to create a proprietary work, all rights reserved,
that dissents against the community or government or whatever,
to hold it proprietary, and to sell copies.

Well, in a society you're only free as long as you don't infringe other peoples freedom. Your freedom ends as your fist hits your opponent's face.
If someone locks you away your freedom is also drastically reduced (while you can say that he has the freedom to lock you away because otherwise he is not free). But of course your're not free as long as your freedom can be jeopardised (by other peoples "freedom").

It's quiet the same with the GPL: You mustn't take away other peoples freedom to code by making GPLed software proprietary.

I guess lots of people have argued about the paradoxon that free software is free due to its restrictions. They did so in the past and will do so in the future...






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page