cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

cc-nc second derivate (no sa)

From: Hans Fuchs <gucky-dated-1106729749.492a5653ab34 AT fangorn.ch>
To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: cc-nc second derivate (no sa)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:55:48 +0100

Hi

When I publish a song with cc-nc. Someone remixes it and publishes without a non-commercial clause. Someone else remixes the song and sells it.

Is this possible? If not, who is at fault?

I ask this because I'm not sure whether I should apply sa or not.

Best,
Hans

--
http://fangorn.ch
http://fangorn.ch/wcal/month.php?cal=HFComplete

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

cc-nc second derivate (no sa), Hans Fuchs, 01/21/2005
- Re: cc-nc second derivate (no sa), Greg London, 01/21/2005
- Re: cc-nc second derivate (no sa), Todd A. Jacobs, 01/28/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- cc-nc second derivate (no sa), Hans Fuchs, 01/21/2005