cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: license question
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:44:28 +0000
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, at 09:54PM, Bryan L. Fordham
<bfordham AT socialistsushi.com> wrote:
>I'm getting ready to put the first stage of a project of mine online.
>Basically it's an American version of http://www.theyworkforyou.com/
>
>So far I have senate voting records, with more to come online shortly.
>
>I want to make the source code and database available. I considered CC for
>the database, but do I even need to bother with that? The information is
>public domain, I assume, since it's just public record stuff. Perhaps I
>should just put the database in the public domain as well?
In theory you can't copyright mere collections of facts in databases in the
US :
http://www.ivanhoffman.com/database.html
This page gives examples of successfully coppyrighted databases (post
'Feist') :
http://www.copyright.gov/reports/dbase.html
but notes:
"Among works that are particularly vulnerable to a finding of
uncopyrightability are comprehensive factual databases covering an entire
universe of information, where the element of "selection" is lacking and the
"arrangement" is obvious. The very comprehensiveness and ease of use of such
a database may account both for its commercial value and its lack of
protection under copyright."
So the copyrightability of your DB depends on whether and how you've selected
the data, and how unusually you're structuring it. If you can copyright the
DB you can license it, otherwise it's public domain anyway.
I am not a lawyer, this is certainly not legal advice. :-)
- Rob.
-
Re: license question,
Rob Myers, 12/01/2004
- Re: license question, Bryan L. Fordham, 12/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.