cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Gottfried Hofmann <toddd AT mypse.goracer.de>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Future plans
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:41:44 +0200
IMHO quite the opposite: every dedication to the Public Domain undermines the Open Content movement. PD work can be used without giving anything back. It will not grow the commons. I can easily see companies pushing PD and PD-alike licenses to allow them to take people's work: see the sudden liking that Microsoft/AdTI found for the BSD license when faced with the success of the GPL.
If CC is about giving back, then why is SA optional?
-
Future plans,
Sigmascape1, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/21/2004
- Re: Future plans, drew Roberts, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Gottfried Hofmann, 10/21/2004
- Re: Future plans, Rob Myers, 10/21/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/21/2004
- Re: Future plans, Evan Prodromou, 10/21/2004
- Re: Future plans, Robin Millette, 10/22/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/22/2004
- [Off List] Re: Future plans, Rob Myers, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Greg London, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Sigmascape1, 10/22/2004
- Re: Future plans, Alexandre Dulaunoy, 10/22/2004
-
Re: Future plans,
Rob Myers, 10/21/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.