Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: IN?

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Alex Schroeder <alex AT gnu.org>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: IN?
  • Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:23:38 +0200

Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com> writes:

> The Berne convention. You get two moral rights: Paternity
> (attribution), and Integrity (the right to object to treatment of
> your work). IN would simulate/manage Integrity much like BY
> simulates/manages Paternity.

As implemented in Switzerland, that just means that you can prevent
people from using your work to damage your reputation. In that case,
you have to sue, and convince the court that your moral rights are in
fact threatened. It isn't a blanket "right to object to treatment of
your work".

Alex.


The exact wording is "kann sich der Urheber oder die Urheberin jeder
Entstellung des Werks widersetzen, die ihn oder sie in der
Persönlichkeit verletzt." [http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/231_1/a11.html]

--
.O. http://www.emacswiki.org/alex/
..O Schroeder's fifth law:
OOO Never accept more work than you can handle in one night of hacking.



  • IN?, Rob Myers, 10/05/2004
    • Re: IN?, Evan Prodromou, 10/06/2004
      • Re: IN?, Rob Myers, 10/06/2004
        • Re: IN?, Alex Schroeder, 10/08/2004
      • Re: IN?, Gottfried Hofmann, 10/06/2004
      • Re: IN?, James Grimmelmann, 10/06/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page