Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: Does people have to share the "source code"?

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: toddd AT mypse.goracer.de
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Kasper Hviid <kasper_hviid AT hotmail.com>
  • Cc: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: Does people have to share the "source code"?
  • Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:40:37 +0200


> In Open Source, people have to share the source code along with the program.
>
>
> Does the same apply to the CC-license?
>

No, that's why many people are using CC licenses for data - the "source" ist
just not clearly defined for most data files while it is obvious for programs.
So if you want a license where people must share the "source", use the GPL.


> I have made a 60 page manual about painting with Photoshop. Lets say I throw
> a CC-license on it.
> A smart guy downloads the manual write four new chapters, clears up the
> language, print the manual and sell it. But if he dont share the source code
> - the *.doc version of the manual - people wont be able to share or change
> the manual, unless they scan every single page.
>
> By the way, I really appreciate the human-readable version of the
> CC-license.
> Many other open licenses has the flaw that their wierd legal code will scare
> everybody away, except people in the Open Source world.
>
> - Kasper Hviid
>








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page